http://www.energyefficiencynews.comAfion Media LtdUS House of Representatives passes historic Waxman-Markey bill<p>The US <a
rel="external"
href="http://www.house.gov/">House of Representatives</a> voted by a narrow margin of seven on Friday to pass the Waxman-Markey bill, the first legislation of its kind in the US aimed at tackling climate change.</p>
<p>The bill, otherwise known as the American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES), sets a target of a 17% reduction in emissions from 2005 levels by 2020 and an 83% reduction by 2050 and would introduce a cap-and-trade system. Energy suppliers would be required to generate 15% power from renewable sources by 2020 and new efficiency standards would be set for buildings, lighting and industry.</p>
<p>“The House has passed the most important energy and environment bill in our nation’s history,” said Representative Edward J. Markey.<br />
The move has been welcomed by environmental and industry groups, as well as energy companies.</p>
<p>“The American Clean Energy and Security Act will help create jobs, foster more domestic energy production from the wind and the sun, and address the climate threat head-on,” commented Lew Hay, chairman and CEO of <a
rel="external"
href="http://www.fplgroup.com/">FPL Group</a>, one of the country’s largest producers of renewable energy.</p>
<p>Energy companies particularly welcomed the provision in the bill to give free allowances to utilities to mitigate the cost to consumers of decarbonising supply.</p>
<p>“This bill is not everything we need, but it is a critical starting point, at a crucial time,” said <a
rel="external"
href="http://www.worldwildlife.org">WWF</a> president and CEO Carter Roberts.</p>
<p>The Act now goes to the Senate, where a vote could take place this autumn, ahead of climate change talks in Copenhagen in December.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, debate rages over what the bill will actually cost. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that, by 2020, the legislation will cost the average household around $175 a year, with low-income households potentially benefitting by $40 a year. The Environmental Protection Agency projects costs of $80-111 per household per year. Both estimates are significantly lower than the figure of over $3000 cited by Republican John Boehner.</p>
<p>For further information:<br />
<a
rel="external"
href="http://waxman.house.gov/">waxman.house.gov/</a><br />
<a
rel="external"
href="http://markey.house.gov/">markey.house.gov/</a><br />
<a
rel="external"
href="http://www.house.gov/">www.house.gov/</a><br />
<a
rel="external"
href="http://www.worldwildlife.org">www.worldwildlife.org</a><br />
<a
rel="external"
href="http://www.fplgroup.com/">www.fplgroup.com/</a><br />
<a
rel="external"
href="http://www.pewclimate.org/">www.pewclimate.org/</a></p>
<p>Related stories:<br />
<a
rel="external"
href="http://www.energyefficiencynews.com/i/2106/">US climate change bill passes first hurdle (22-May)</a><br />
<a
rel="external"
href="http://www.energyefficiencynews.com/i/2090/">Democrats reach compromise on US climate change bill (15-May)</a></p>
http://www.energyefficiencynews.com/policy/i/2212/
2009-06-29T00:00:00-00:00US policy, energy efficiency, climate change, carbon emissions, Waxman-Markey bill, American Clean Energy and Security Act, ACES